Stories and Essays

Why play chess?

Member ratings
  • Well argued: 100%
  • Interesting points: 100%
  • Agree with arguments: 100%
3 ratings - view all
Why play chess?

Two men playing chess. The Article.

In mid 17th century Japan, Miyamoto Musashi, the invincible Samurai warrior, wrote Go Rin No Sho, A Book of Five Rings, a penetrating analysis of victorious Samurai strategy. For over three centuries this martial arts masterpiece remained a Japanese secret, but in 1974 it was discovered by the West. Almost overnight, the new translation sold more than 120,000 copies in hardback, catapulted to best-seller status in paperback and drew lavish praise from leading newspapers around the world.

Time Magazine wrote: ‘On Wall Street, when Musashi talks, people listen.’ The New York Times added that Musashi’s strategy was ‘suddenly a hot issue on Wall Street’.

From one thing, know ten thousand

Musashi’s central message is one of ‘wider application’, of ‘transferability’. Achieving mastery in one discipline arms you with the weapon to transfer those skills to all other areas of life. Although on the surface-Musashi’s book is specifically a guide to Samurai swordsmanship, at deeper levels it provides a blueprint for strategy, decision and action in the home, on the battlefield, in the corporate boardroom – in fact, wherever you choose to apply it.

Musashi summarised its essence thus, stating and re-stating his theme throughout the book: ‘From one thing, know ten thousand things. When you attain the Way of strategy there will not be one thing you cannot see … . If you know the Way broadly you will see it in everything.’

The mind sports metaphor

In spite of its undoubted brilliance, Musashi’s book has two draw-­backs for a modern audience. First, Musashi frequently expresses himself in obscure and impenetrable Zen term­inology. Secondly, the 21st century reader will find it difficult, if not impossible, to participate at any meaningful level in Musashi’s prime metaphor, that of Samurai swordsmanship, when with a real blade you face an opponent whom you must kill before he kills you. We are not likely to wield a Samurai sword in a life or death situ­ation. Samurai swordsmanship will always remain beyond most people’s personal experience.

Accordingly, let us consider the easy-to-learn game of chess, already well established as an important thinking and business meta­phor. It re-interprets and updates Musashi’s martial arts message, and extends it through a new dimension, a martial art of the mind. The phrase martial art was, in fact , first used in English in Alexander Pope’s 18th century translation of Homer’s Iliad.

In its various manifestations (Western, Japanese and Chinese) chess is the world’s most popular mind sport, with well over 600 million devotees. ( Yougov stats) . As we have seen in Daniel Johnson’s brilliant exposition of Alpha Zero in an earlier issue of The Article, Chess is also at the cutting edge of the quest for artificial intelligence. Six times World Champion Garry Kasparov , for example, twice faced off in matches against IBM’s Deep Blue super-computer with million-dollar prize funds were at stake.Now the Deep Mind company of Demis Hassabis CBE, originator of Alpha Zero, has attained a £400 million price tag when acquired by Google.

Victory without killing

Most importantly, though, chess offers the experience of real victory, without killing, and the parallel experience of real defeat, without having to die. Playing chess, you face pressure of time, you must assess risk accurately, and you must think globally and locally: in other words, it is all down to you. You truly win or you truly lose.

No accidental results

There are no accidental or chance results in chess. The ethos of entitlement and the syndrome of blaming others for setbacks are both alien to the game. Indeed, it is the qualities of personal enter­prise and self-reliance that distinguish chess. The chess-player should not blindly accept the pronouncements of authority. Thinking for yourself is what counts. At the chessboard, real situations beckon and, as Musashi would have put it, in mastering chess, you master in microcosm all forms of combat and strategy, for any application you may choose. In my personal view, chess is the ultimate Right-wing game!

Lessons and benefits

If chess were a game only, chess would never have survived the serious trials to which it has, during the long time of its existence, been often subjected. By some ardent enthusiasts chess has been elevated into a science or an art. It is neither; but its principal characteristic seems to be – what human nature mostly delights in – a fight. Not a fight, indeed, such as would tickle the nerves of coarser natures, where blood flows and the blows delivered leave their visible traces on the bodies of the combatants, but a fight in which the scientific, the artistic, the purely intellectual element holds undivided sway. ‘

– Emanuel Lasker, World Chess Champion 1894 to 1921

Why choose chess?

Chess is open to everyone, regardless of age, gender, physical or economic status, and offers many specific and profound benefits.

Developing memory power

International Grandmasters can play many opponents simul­taneously and remember all the moves from each game. They were not born with this skill: they developed it through intense practice and concentration. Memory is the cornerstone of intelligence and the database for creative thinking. All creative thinking is the result of new combinations of recalled ideas. As you learn chess openings and basic patterns of play you begin to flex and strengthen your memory muscles. I have, for example, challenged 107 opponents placed in a giant square around me, at Oxford 1973, and in three hours lost just one game, winning 101 and drawing 5. After the display I could remember all the moves of every single game.

Slowing the ageing process

According to Leonardo da Vinci, ‘Iron rusts from disuse, water that does not flow becomes stagnant, so it is with the human mind.’ Much of what passes for mental decline with age results from ‘disuse’. Research has shown that individuals who regularly play mental sports are less susceptible to Alzheimer’s and other diseases associated with advancing years. Chess keeps your mind agile, strong and clear as you get older.

Aesthetics

The geometry of Chess is beautiful. The artist Marcel Duchamp believed that: ‘Every chess-player experiences a mixture of two aesthetic pleasures: firstly, the abstract image, linked with aesthetic ideas; secondly the rational pleasure of ideographically implementing this image on the chessboard. Not all artists may be chess-players, but all chess­-players are artists.’

Chess is a sensual as well as a ‘purely mental’ delight.’ A good chess set is a work of art. As you play and learn in this vibrant uni­verse of black and white squares, you come to love the feel of the pieces in your hand, and to revel in the dramatic diagonal sweep of the bishop, the delightful leap of the knight, and the powerful thrust of the rook.

Self-knowledge and insight into others

For those given to reflection, chess offers a mirror to self­ understanding. Can you follow through when you have made a plan? How do you hold up under pressure? Are you impatient? Are you mentally lazy? Can you manage time? Do you play to win or to draw? Does fear of making mistakes prevent you trying something creative? Do you attend to details? Are you a gracious winner, a sore loser?

As well as teaching you about your own strengths and weaknesses, chess can develop your ability to understand others. To succeed at chess, you must learn to. think like your opponent, even if your opponent’s style of thinking is very different from your own.

‘Life is like a game of chess:we draw up a plan; this plan, however, is conditional on what – in chess, our opponent – in life, our fate – will choose to do. ‘

Arthur Schopenhauer, Parerga and Paralipomena,1851

Stronger decision-making and accountability

In many areas of life, one can get by with waffling, finger-pointing and obfuscation, but not on the chessboard. Chess is a game of decision-making. The root of the word ‘decide’ means ‘to kill the alternatives’. In chess, you must decide on a move in a given time, make it, and be prepared to live with the consequences. As World Champion Emanuel Lasker commented, ‘On the chessboard, lies and hypocrisy do not survive long.’

Sharpening analytical and strategic thinking

Asked what use chess was, the German philosopher Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz replied that it provided ‘practice in the ability to think and innovate. Wherever we have to make use of reason, we need an elaborate method to reach our goals. And moreover: a person’s resourcefulness is most apparent when playing.’

Innovation and ‘resourcefulness’ are even more important today. The ability to analyse a problem, plan its solution, and then carry out that plan is life’s most important skill. Chess hones this ability in a unique and dramatically effective fashion.

‘Improvement of … endeavour, the prevention of idleness, and the training of far-sighted, logical mental enjoyment. ‘

Jacobus de Cessolis writing in about 1300 about the invention of chess. De Cessolis was a Dominican monk who employed chess allegories in his sermons.

‘Arabian texts of the 10th century AD not only praised the beauty of chess, the authors of the period also recommended chess as an educational aid in the development of logical thinking. They further held the opinion that chess could lead to an insight into things to come, could enhance friendships, and also protect against loneliness. The Arabs became enthusiastic players and all classes of society were enchanted by the game. Even the Caliphs played and were very generous to the masters, the best of whom was As-Suli, showering them with gold and gifts. As-Suli’s fame was so great that he was later credited with having invented the game. Almost 300 years later it was still considered a great honour for a master to be likened to As-Suli. ‘

– Finkenzeller, Ziehr and Buhrer, Chess: a Celebration of 2000 Years

Applying chess-based skills

Ask any top head-hunter what kind of person they seek to hire for senior management positions. They will tell you that, besides the basics of strong analytical and decision-making skills, they need people with superior strategic-thinking abilities who are willing to be accountable for their actions: people with insight into others, who can plan and act under pressure, especially in the face of uncertainty. There is no better way to develop these abilities than through chess and other mind sports.

Risk and Reward 

A background in chess may prove better preparation for business success than even an MBA or a PhD. In 1990 Bankers Trust, a lead­ing US financial institution, ran advertisements in Chess Life, the world’s widest-read chess magazine, seeking talent for its trading division. The advertisements generated over a thousand resumés; the bank interviewed a hundred respondents and hired five, two of them chess grandmasters, the other three international masters. During World War Two the British Government code breaking centre at Bletchley Park hired all the strongest UK chess masters. One of them , two times British Chess Champion, C.H.O’D. (Hugh) Alexander, was portrayed prominently in The Imitation Game, the recent film about the breaking of the Nazi codes.

One of the gurus behind the Bankers Trust programme was international chess master Norman Weinstein, who became the bank’s top foreign exchange trader, before moving on to Odyssey Partners. Weinstein attributes his success to his chess background. In an interview in 1994 with Forbes , Weinstein emphasised:

“In chess, you learn to plan variations of play, to make a decision tree. One thing I find myself better in than most people is developing a strategy and implementing it. I’ll say, ‘If he does this, we’ll do that,’ whereas many very, very bright people will talk in generalities.”

As an example Weinstein discussed his approach to analysing the possible break-up of the European monetary system:

“To make a play on this involved shorting a number of currencies, which is very expensive to do. So I … did a poll of traders and economists, asked them to guess the probabilities of a break-up, and ran these through the risk-return analysis. The results made it clear that it would be profitable to keep on shorting the market, despite the day-to-day losses. It paid off in about one month.”

He added that chess develops talent for rapidly calculating prob­abilities, spotting opportunities and balancing risks against rewards. At the same time it also cultivates willingness to stick to a strategy, even when it produces losing streaks in the short run, an essential trait for investment managers and business leaders. SKANDIA, the international finance giant, used a powerful chess theme throughout its 1995 report on value-creating processes and intellectual capital.

Michael Becker, a champion mental athlete and trader on the American Stock Exchange, told Forbes that chess is the ideal way to develop analytical ability. He recruits and trains traders and always looks for accomplished chess players. One of his most successful trainees is Ronald Henley, a chess grandmaster who now runs his own firm. Becker says that traders with a background in mental sports consistently out-perform their colleagues.

As part of an intensive three-week leadership training course, the top 250 managers of LGT, the international banking and investment company, all receive daily tuition in chess and other mental sports. Gerard Quirke, European Operations Director for LGT’s asset management business, told me:

“We now have a thriving LGT International Chess Group, with people playing every day, even on electronic mail, with colleagues from all over the world. Learning to play chess as part of the course acted like aerobic exercise,but on the mind. It was like a personal fitness regime for the brain.”

Notable chess players

Alexius Comnenus, the 11th-century Byzantine Emperor, was alleg­edly playing chess when he was surprised by a murderous conspiracy. Being a good chess-player, he managed to escape! In real life the Aladdin of the fairy tale was a chess-player, a lawyer from Samarkand in the court of Tamburlaine, the 14th-century conqueror of much of Asia. Tamburlaine himself loved to play chess; he named his son Shah Rukh, for he was moving a rook when the birth was announced. Goethe was an avid chess-player and believed that the game was essential to the cultivation of the intellect. Benjamin Franklin, another genius, was also an enthusiast – his Morals of Chess, was the first ever book on chess published in the USA. Other notable chess enthusiasts were Queen Elizabeth I, Russian Czar and founder of the Russian Navy, Peter the Great, and the French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte, as documented at length in Napoleon the Great, published two years ago by noted historian Andrew Roberts

The rage of New York

It is a grave mistake to think that chess, the intellectual game of profound concentration and Trappist silence, is an anti-social game, or that its players are all drawn from social elites. Throughout the world its appeal is deep-rooted, and it shows that intelligence – like a cultured foot or fist – is no respecter of condi­tioning or class. In New York’s parks, games are played at lightning speed (only wimps need time to think), with resident hustlers pocket­ ing an endless flow of bets. To chess traditionalists, this is startling enough. Even more significant, chess has proved itself a game, like football or boxing, that can lift poor kids out of the ghetto. In London and Berlin , for example, the amazing new sport of Chessboxing (combining the two activities in alternate bouts) has begun to flourish.

The Raging Rooks, a team from Adam Clayton Powell Junior School in Harlem, are an example. In April 1991, four students from this school in one of the most deprived areas in the whole of New York, wiped the board with teams from 60 other schools – some private and elite, and just about all of them better off than themselves – to win the US Chess Federation’s National Junior Championships. They had hardly been out of Harlem before. One of them had never even ridden in an elevator. Yet suddenly they had to get used to the full and questioning glare of the public and the media.

Women and chess

The world has become accustomed to brilliant results by the Hungar­ian prodigy Judit Polgar. But although an increasing number of female players are pushing to the fore, male chess players still form the great majority in top-level international competitions. Why should this be the case?

In the times of the Arabic efflorescence, around 1000 AD , many stories circulated concern­ing powerful female chess-players. During the Renaissance in Europe, the playing of chess by women was a common theme in contem­porary art. Even as late as the 18th century, the English artist Angelica Kaufmann, whose tondos adorn the foyer of London’s Royal Academy, could depict herself playing chess as a symbol of the abstract notion of Composition. It was only during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, when chess became accepted as a possible profession, that the role of female players receded into the background. Indeed, for most of the 20th century, male and female players have been segregated into separate Championships.

This is all now due to change, and probably quite swiftly. Unlike physical activities, mental sports , such as chess , present absolutely no barriers to competition of gender, race or physical strength. The time will doubtless – and soon – come when one of Judit’s followers will be competing in her own right for the absolute championship of the world.

Nigel Short , who has joined the unfortunate academic Sir Tim Hunt by casting aspersions on female brainpower, has nevertheless admitted that his greatest embarrassment came when he lost to the Georgian female world champion Maya Chiburdanidze. One of Argentina’s top chessplayers is Claudia Amura. Two of Britain’s champion players, John Nunn and James Plaskett, have both been beaten , not just by teenagers, but by teenage girls. Nobody likes to be beaten. Men especially do not like to be beaten by women. But they will have to get used to it, for there has been a rush of new female talent around the world. Among those at the top of the ratings are Alisa Maric from Former Yugoslavia, Nana Ioseliani from Georgia, Pia Cramling from Sweden,teenager Hoanng Trang from Vietnam, and Hou Yifan, the former Women’s World Champion, from China.

The Polgar sisters

According to Cathy Forbes, the former British Women’s Champion, one of the reasons women are on a roll is the startling success of the Hungarian Polgar sisters. These young women, raised to be masters of the game by their dedicated and ambitious father Laszlo, have all turned out to be extraordinarily successful. “Their achievement has inspired a generation of women and girls,’ says Forbes, who has written a book about the family. ‘The growth has been amazing. There used to be just a handful of good women chess-players. Now they’re all very good.”

To Forbes, the Polgar experiment shows exactly what she herself has long believed – that excellence in chess can be taught. Girls are not born mentally less well equipped than boys; it is nurture, not nature, that makes the difference.

Member ratings
  • Well argued: 100%
  • Interesting points: 100%
  • Agree with arguments: 100%
3 ratings - view all

You may also like